Enhancing operative documentation of emergency laparotomy: a systematic review and development of a synoptic reporting template.

INTRODUCTION: Currently, operative reports are narrative and often handwritten, making interpretation difficult and potentially omitting key steps of the procedure. This study undertook a systematic review to determine the current availability of synoptic operative reporting and develop a synoptic operative record template for emergency laparotomy (EL). METHODS: A PROSPERO registered study from January 1st, 2012, to December 31st, 2022, was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases in February 2023. KEYWORDS: emergency laparotomy AND operation notes OR operative notes OR documentation OR report OR pro forma OR narrative OR synoptic OR digital OR audio-visual. Studies on paediatric or pregnant patients, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, case reports, editorial comments, and letters were excluded. A synoptic operative record was designed to include key standards in the documentation, as suggested by the Colleges of Surgeons. RESULTS: The literature search yielded 4687 articles, and no relevant published articles were found. A detailed synoptic template was developed, which included 111 fields related to patient demographics, operative findings, interventions, and documentation of key variables associated with patient outcomes. 11 were text boxes, two were related to digital audio-visual uploads, and three facilitated the digital scoring/grading of findings. CONCLUSION: This systematic review identified a limited number of publications reporting synoptic operative reporting, and none related to emergency laparotomy. This novel operative template provides a platform for clear documentation of the surgery performed during emergency laparotomy, potentially facilitating data analysis, resident training, and research, in turn leading to a better understanding of patient outcomes.

The Diagnostic Accuracy of Hyperbilirubinemia in Predicting Appendicitis and Appendiceal Perforation.

Background Every diagnostic tool that may assist in the identification of appendicitis is of great importance to emergency general surgeons. While recent research has indicated that hyperbilirubinemia can serve as a valuable predictor of appendiceal perforation, these studies have not specifically examined the role of bilirubin as an indicator for acute appendicitis. This study aimed to assess the role of hyperbilirubinemia as a diagnostic factor in detecting appendicitis and appendiceal perforation. Methodology This single-center retrospective study involved 333 patients with acute appendicitis who underwent an emergency appendectomy at a model three hospital between January 2021 and December 2022. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA/SE 18.0 for Windows (StataCorp., College Station, TX, USA) to compare bilirubin levels, white blood cell count (WCC), and C-reactive protein (CRP) among normal appendices, non-perforated appendicitis, and perforated appendicitis. Results Among 333 patients, 60.66% were male, and 39.34% were female, with a male-to-female ratio of 1.54:1. The average hospital stay was 3.27 ± 3.02 days. Hyperbilirubinemia was observed in 25.53% (85 individuals). Among the 51 cases of perforated appendicitis, 70.59% had elevated bilirubin levels of above 20 µmol/L. Significantly more patients with appendiceal perforation had hyperbilirubinemia than non-perforated appendicitis (70.59% vs. 19.03%, p < 0.001). Bilirubin had higher specificity (94.29%) for detecting non-perforated appendicitis than normal appendices (odds ratio = 3.88), while WCC and CRP showed higher sensitivities. WCC had a sensitivity of 73.28% and a specificity of 42.86%, and CRP had a sensitivity of 76.53% and a specificity of 60.00%. When comparing perforated appendicitis with non-perforated appendicitis, bilirubin showed a specificity of 80.97% and an odds ratio of 10.21. The likelihood of a patient with hyperbilirubinemia having perforated appendicitis was more than 10 times higher than those without appendiceal perforation, suggesting it to be a potential indicator for appendiceal perforation. WCC showed a specificity of 26.72% and an odds ratio of 4.28, while CRP had a specificity of 23.48% and an odds ratio of 4.91. Conclusions The significant association between bilirubin levels and appendicitis highlights its potential as a valuable marker for predicting appendicitis and appendiceal perforation. The simplicity, cost-effectiveness, and diagnostic value of bilirubin assessment support its routine use in suspected cases of acute appendicitis.